SpeakCode vs Vibeyard: canvas or agent grid?

Updated 2026-09-13 · competitor facts verified 2026-09-13

Verdict

Pick Vibeyard if…

Pick Vibeyard if you want a free MIT-licensed app with a session grid, usage tracking, and WebRTC sharing on macOS, Linux, or Windows.

Pick SpeakCode if…

Pick SpeakCode if you want a native macOS 26+ canvas with an agent inbox, turn-triggered belts, and workspace roles with terminal typing grants.

A free, MIT-licensed agent desktop app with a session grid, usage tracking, and live WebRTC sharing.

Platforms: macOS, Linux, and Windows; also available through npm global install. · Pricing: Free. · License: Open source, MIT.

Visit Vibeyard

Vibeyard and SpeakCode, feature by feature

Vibeyard facts verified 2026-09-13 from their public site and repo. Spotted an error? Email info@speakcode.ai.

What Vibeyard offers

Vibeyard is a free, open-source app under the MIT license. It presents agent sessions in a grid called swarm mode and in tabs. Downloads cover macOS, Linux, and Windows, and there is an npm global install option. Vibeyard is an Electron-style desktop app using Node.js 18+, node-pty, and xterm.js.

Its supported CLIs include Claude Code, Codex CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, and Gemini CLI. Those tools must be installed and authenticated. Vibeyard also has a per-project kanban board whose cards spawn or resume sessions and automatically move to Done. If your preferred way to organize agents is a task board plus a regular grid, that is a concrete reason to choose it.

What SpeakCode offers

SpeakCode is a native Swift and SwiftUI macOS app with SwiftTerm terminals that host the real Claude Code and Codex CLIs. You bring your own provider accounts. The desktop app is macOS 26+ only, closed source, and paid: $20/month or $200/year, with no free trial. It has no Windows or Linux desktop version.

SpeakCode uses one infinite canvas per Workspace, corresponding to one project folder. Tabs run across the top, and terminal, agent, task, browser, note, and editor cards can be placed together. SpeakCode does not manage git worktrees; separate working directories and branches remain something you prepare yourself.

Where both apps fit

Both products give Claude Code and Codex sessions a surrounding interface for tasks and project context. Both also offer live sharing. Vibeyard supports encrypted WebRTC session sharing with a PIN and read-only or read-write access. SpeakCode shares real terminal output and workspace state, with host-controlled roles and per-terminal typing grants.

Both provide a browser near the agent workflow. Vibeyard's embedded browser includes DOM element picking. SpeakCode has browser cards alongside notes and editor cards, with no DOM element picking. For a UI review that involves selecting page elements for an agent, Vibeyard provides that browser feature.

Where they differ in practice

Grid sessions and a spatial canvas

Vibeyard's swarm mode uses a grid, with tabs as another session view. Its kanban cards provide a task-oriented route into those sessions. This suits a preference for repeated, regularly arranged panels and tasks that directly spawn or resume work.

SpeakCode lets you position cards on an infinite 2D surface. You could place an implementation terminal beside a review terminal and keep a note with the acceptance criteria nearby. At low zoom, live terminals become placeholder cards, so the overview does not show every terminal's live text. The parallel agent workflow focuses on that combination of spatial layout and attention controls.

Usage inspection and waiting-agent controls

Vibeyard lists real-time cost, token, and context-window tracking per session. Its session inspector adds a timeline, cost breakdown, and tool statistics. It also supports multiple Claude Code profiles with isolated configuration directories, such as work and personal profiles. Those are specific advantages if account separation and usage inspection drive your app choice.

SpeakCode's Agent inbox collects agents waiting on you with a standup-style summary. Nodes show idle, working, waiting, and exited phases, plus an Activity feed. Detection works without configuration, with opt-in Claude Code Stop/Notification hooks or Codex notify for exact signals. Vibeyard's equivalent cross-agent inbox and exact four-phase model are not listed on their site; cost tracking alone does not answer which agent needs input.

Hand-offs and task isolation

SpeakCode belts are directed card-to-card connections that fire when the source agent finishes its turn. They can Press Enter, Run command, or Deliver output consisting of the last 40 non-blank captured screen lines. Delivery is dropped if the target is not running and does not wait for a busy target. Keep the destination running and ready to receive output when the source finishes.

Vibeyard's Team feature installs shared agent definitions across providers. Turn-triggered terminal delivery and built-in git worktree management are not listed on their site. In SpeakCode, create worktrees yourself and select the appropriate directory for each terminal before agents start editing separate branches.

Two approaches to sharing

Vibeyard already provides live session sharing over encrypted WebRTC, with PIN access and read-only or read-write modes. SpeakCode's documented controls include a waiting room, editor/viewer/blocked roles, and separate grants for typing into each terminal. These are different permission models around shared agent work, and either can be relevant depending on how much workspace control a guest needs.

SpeakCode works over the LAN out of the box. Internet sessions require your own LiveKit server and token service configured in Settings → Collaboration. Its sharing guide explains that setup. Vibeyard offers remote session sharing through WebRTC. SSH host support and a mobile companion are not listed on their site.

Who should pick which

Pick Vibeyard if a free MIT-licensed app, Windows or Linux support, usage tracking, or a regular session grid best matches your requirements. Its WebRTC sharing also makes it a real option for letting another person watch or type into a session. If those features cover your needs, there is no reason here to add a subscription merely to change the layout.

Pick SpeakCode if the Agent inbox, source-turn belts, and spatial workspace with terminal-specific grants address a problem you repeatedly encounter. That choice requires macOS 26+, $20/month or $200/year, and acceptance of no free trial, closed source, and manual worktree setup. The benefit should come from those concrete controls, while Vibeyard remains the stronger fit for a free cross-platform grid with documented usage inspection.

Questions

Does Vibeyard support live session sharing?

Yes, Vibeyard supports encrypted WebRTC sharing with a PIN and read-only or read-write access. SpeakCode shares real terminals and workspace state with roles and separate per-terminal typing grants.

Can Vibeyard run on Windows or Linux?

Yes, Vibeyard lists Windows, Linux, and macOS downloads. SpeakCode is a macOS 26+ desktop app only.

Does SpeakCode manage git worktrees?

No, you create and manage worktrees yourself, then point SpeakCode terminals at their directories. Vibeyard worktree management is not listed on their site.

Sources

• https://vibeyard.app/
• https://github.com/elirantutia/vibeyard

Pair Programming with AI Agents | SpeakCode · All comparisons